Tiffanie Darke had spent her career in fashion — journalist, editor, creative strategist, eventually editor-in-chief at Harrods. She was, by any reasonable measure, the person fashion is made for. And for years she did what the industry expected of her. "I definitely had the years where I consumed too much fashion because I wasn't really aware of the impact of what I was doing. I never asked where my clothes come from and where they go."
Two things changed that. The first was Rana Plaza: the 2013 factory collapse in Bangladesh that killed over a thousand garment workers and briefly put the supply chain on front pages. She noticed it, but didn't yet look. The second was the pandemic, during her time at Harrods. "I really kind of looked into supply chains and production and manufacturing and the impact that our sort of excessive fashion appetite has." She took a sustainability course. She learned the facts. "With sustainability kind of once you know you know."
What she learned, among other things: in the west, to meet climate targets, the average person can only afford to buy five new items of clothing a year. Not twenty. Not a seasonal refresh. Five.
"This was quite a massive report in terms of being very black and white and clear-cut over the scale of the problem and the need for the solution. Although five is a very radical number, like for someone who loves fashion and who loves shopping, just buying only five things a year seems really hard, but it's also quite tangible."
Tangible. That word is doing something. She did not respond to this number with grief or resistance. She decided that if she believed what she'd learned, she should act on it. "And if I do only buy five things, then they're going to be five really, really good things. And I'm going to really research them. I'm going to make sure that that value relationship that I have with each of those five things is the best that it could possibly be."
What followed was not deprivation. It was the opposite. "The idea of that suddenly seemed to be quite fun. Like, if I'm going to buy a white shirt, I'm going to buy the best godamn white shirt that the world can find me." One pair of shoes a year means choosing very differently than when shoes are disposable. "You have to really think about it."
The Rule of Five is not a savings strategy. It is a philosophy that happens to produce savings. The constraint forces a different relationship with each purchase — what it is, where it comes from, whether it is actually the thing. Most people shop to fill a feeling. Five items a year means you can't. You have to know what you actually want.
The industry she came from ran on the opposite logic: more seasons, more drops, more urgency, more spend. "The fashion industry was making" — she says this flatly — and she was buying, and she never thought to ask what that meant until she was in a position where she had to.
The number was five. That was also the point.
* * *
If any of this sounds familiar, this is the conversation it came from:
Fashion Is Broken: The Rule of Five That Can Change Your Life — Tiffanie Darke
Books mentioned: What to Wear — Tiffanie Darke | Now We Are 40 — Tiffanie Darke